"How best to answer this but with a number of pretentious quotes?" Indeed, sir. Indeed.

Isn't there a someone or other's law that ninety percent of everything is crap? I try to keep that in mind when considering this kind of thing. For some people, of course, even Woolf is part of that ninety percent. I like Woolf, but I don't like James Joyce's DUBLINERS, which, according to a lot of people, is just as good. (Admittedly, maybe I would like different James Joyce better. I've never tried.)

The balance is definitely delicate between truth and Truth, and yes, I'd agree that it changes with every story. Quote from somebody, somewhere: "You don't learn to write a novel, you learn to write this novel." It's probably just as true for short stories.

I think I have a story inside of me in which one plot is in the foreground, but in the background, a lot of other things are gradually accumulating, as you say, discrete change particles. (I love that phrase.) At some point, that story will emerge.

RE: side side note: It needed more monster trucks. On the other hand, everything needs more monster trucks.

(You vanish for six months and then reappear with a page-and-a-half long comment on my LJ. How am I not surprised?)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 12:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios